Demanding More From Writers or Unfair Practice?

by In: Content | Published: Nov 13, 2009

At some papers, writ­ers are stripped of bylines if their arti­cles do not meet the stan­dards of the pub­li­ca­tion. The result, no pay and no clip. This is the ulti­mate insult to a reporter, really. It surely would get someone’s attention.

My ques­tion, is this a proper way to han­dle stu­dent jour­nal­ists? How many of you work at papers that use this prac­tice?
If you do some­thing dif­fer­ent, what is it?

 

About Steve Fox

Career newspaper journalist and full-time faculty member at Ferris State University. Also adviser to student newspaper, The Torch.
 
 

5 Responses

  1. jessicamaes7 says:

    I would say that is a bit harsh. Being a stu­dent jour­nal­ist, yeah, that would be insult­ing, but it is a way of say­ing one def­i­nitely needs to improve.

    I can see where if a stu­dent jour­nal­ist wasn’t work­ing to the best of their abil­ity and didn’t take the time and effort to improve, then yeah. But if it’s a writer’s first time and they don’t have enough expe­ri­ence, tak­ing it easy on them wouldn’t be a bad thing.

    Does the Torch use this prac­tice? Just curious.

  2. tyjohnson1 says:

    I’m against this kind of pun­ish­ment because I don’t think it sends a pro­duc­tive mes­sage to the writer. If they fail, they fail and their name isn’t even attached to their fail­ure and it’s just another bad story your paper printed. Remem­ber read­ers don’t care what hap­pened before your story hit press. They are only inter­ested in see­ing a good prod­uct on the back end.

    Print­ing bad sto­ries should always be avoided (duh). Have house ads ready to place where a story would have gone. Make it a “Join us!” one if you can. The read­ers don’t know a hor­ri­ble story was almost there, or a writer blew an assign­ment. They just know you’re hir­ing and then they flip the page.

    Men­tion it at the next staff meet­ing. I do every week.

    See how we only ran three sto­ries on this page? This house ad was sup­posed to be a story, but a blown assignment/short story led us to run this in place.”

    Try to inspire your staff to take own­er­ship of the pages – to be proud or ashamed when it looks bad. I do a weekly cri­tique where I tell my news staff exactly how stressed out I was the past week in hopes they’ll try harder in the future. The meet­ings are always on Sun­days, so the fail­ures of the past week aren’t fresh enough to hurt feel­ings, but they can spur writ­ers to improve.

    As far as how to han­dle a reporter that just handed in a bad story, here’s my take:

    If a story is bad, have them rewrite it. If it has to run and there’s no time, rewrite it your­self, split the by line or add “[Editor’s name] con­tributed to this story,” at the end of the article.

    If the writer is con­tin­u­ing to hand in sloppy arti­cles, it’s time for some one-on-one train­ing. Make sure they know what they’re doing wrong, but be specific.

    Is it their reporting/interviewing skills that needs work or are they strug­gling with grammar/style? Don’t just tell them the arti­cle is bad. Tell them exactly what they need to improve.

    If they’re a lost cause, or they aren’t improv­ing, it’s time to let them go. We’re not here to teach every warm body that walks in how to write, we’re here to take teach journalism.

  3. fox says:

    If a stu­dent is writ­ing for a first time, should he/she even be in a sit­u­a­tion to be paid?

    I think this pol­icy would be for a hired writer who is expected to do good work. Some­one who is paid.

    I also think there are some real stan­dards that can be set: facts must be cor­rect, names spelled cor­rectly, etc.… If those things are wrong, then maybe bylines should be pulled off. Or, pos­si­bly just as effec­tive, story pulled and the writer required to improve it before publication.

    I think both these cases are options for show­ing writ­ers they must meet pro­fes­sional expec­ta­tions. Is this stan­dard held up often enough at stu­dent papers?

  4. fox says:

    Ty,
    What about if the paper has higher stan­dards than what you’re insin­u­at­ing. I’m not talk­ing about bad writ­ing. I’m talk­ing about very high stan­dards — if there is a mis-spelled word, some Style Book errors, etc,.. How much accept­able to still get paid?

  5. Benjamin Thayer says:

    Even though these are stu­dent news­pa­pers, I believe the higher stan­dards should be in place. I agree with Fox that these stan­dards should apply to paid staff who have been given ade­quate time to learn the process and the A.P. style rules.

    As far as I know, this method is not used much at the Torch. As the Sports Edi­tor, I know that I have not used it with our sports writ­ers. This is also the first semes­ter that either of them has writ­ten for a col­lege news­pa­per. It is the editor’s respon­si­bil­ity to send it back and make the writer fix and learn from his or her mistakes.

    If names are mis­spelled and facts are incor­rect, the story should cer­tainly be sent back to the writer. If there is no time to do so, that may be a sit­u­a­tion where the writer’s name could be pulled off of the story.

    I would be more inclined to use this only after this has hap­pened a few times because every­one makes mis­takes from time to time. As edi­tors, it is our job to work with the writ­ers and teach them the cor­rect way to write and explain how to fix mis­takes. If such mis­takes are made con­tin­u­ously, then this action would be appropriate.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.